Quit fucking tailgating bicyclists. Particularly if you're a city bus going down one of the steepest hills, with zero chance of stopping in time.
Sincerely,
Posted via LiveJournal app for iPhone.
Quit fucking tailgating bicyclists. Particularly if you're a city bus going down one of the steepest hills, with zero chance of stopping in time.
Sincerely,
Posted via LiveJournal app for iPhone.
Evidence-based medicine categorizes different types of clinical evidence and rates or grades them [10] according to the strength of their freedom from the various biases that beset medical research. For example, the strongest evidence for therapeutic interventions is provided by systematic review of randomized,triple-blind, placebo-controlled trials with allocation concealment and complete follow-up involving a homogeneous patient population and medical condition. In contrast, patient testimonials, case reports, and even expert opinion (however some critics have argued that expert opinion "does not belong in the rankings of the quality of empirical evidence because it does not represent a form of empirical evidence" and continue that "expert opinion would seem to be a separate, complex type of knowledge that would not fit into hierarchies otherwise limited to empirical evidence alone."[11]) have little value as proof because of the placebo effect, the biases inherent in observation and reporting of cases, difficulties in ascertaining who is an expert, and more.
What should we require in the title of an article we might trust?
| randomized |
| placebo |
| controlled |
| multicenter |
| double-blind |
| systematic |
| crossover |
| phase iii |
| critical |
| parallel |
| publication bias |
| review |
| other (leave in comments) |
What should we require in the body even if not required in the title?
| randomized |
| placebo |
| controlled |
| multicenter |
| double-blind |
| systematic |
| crossover |
| phase iii |
| critical |
| publication bias |
| review |
| other (leave in comments) |
You are viewing
jodawi's journal